Like most of the images on this website, the photograph in this post was taken with a Canon 5D Mark ii. I bought my 5D Mark ii in late 2012, when it was the outgoing model being replaced by the Canon 5D Mark iii. I’ve kept my 5D Mark ii through the reigns of the 5D Mark iii, 5D Mark iv, 5Dsr, and now the newly introduced 5R. Since the Canon 5D Mark ii was first released in late 2008, as of this writing it is a 12-year-old camera, which is an eternity for a digital camera. Why haven’t I upgraded it?
Well, truth to tell, I’ve been meaning to for awhile, but I’m surprised at how little urgency I feel to do so. The new Canon 5R is the first Canon camera I’ve felt would be worth the upgrade. For various reasons, none of the 5D Mark iii, 5D Mark iv, or 5Dsr really held my interest. I’ll check out the 5R, and if it holds up like I think it will, I’ll probably get one. Eventually.
In the meantime, I suppose I really like my 5D Mark ii. It’s been getting the job done. It makes inkjet prints 21 inches wide pretty much just fine, and I rarely find the need to print much larger than that. Web pages and print publications have been no problem. I have no doubt image quality is better from newer camera models, but I don’t feel the image quality produced from the 5D Mark ii is holding me back (indeed, I tend to like images that are a bit “rough around the edges” – I kind of wonder if I would find images from newer cameras to be too “clean” somehow). Plus, I’ve been using my 5D Mark ii for so long, I’m really at home with it.
There’s a lesson in all this somewhere. Maybe it’s the idea that you don’t need the latest equipment to produce artful images. Maybe, in some cases, older equipment might even be better. I’m sure I’ll get around to upgrading my camera at some point, probably sooner rather than later. But it seems not be an urgent matter for me, so looks like it will be my 5D Mark ii and me, for at least a little while longer.