As has been mentioned before on this blog, I really enjoy reading the blogs of other photographers. I don’t have many photographer friends myself, so it often becomes the principle way in which I get information about how the rest of the photography community practices this discipline.
I just was reading the blog of one landscape photographer (whose work I really like, by the way) who described how their practice of landscape photography has changed. This person’s principle method used to be “chasing the light,” which apparently involved road trips of hundreds or even thousands of miles at a time, crossing state lines and studying maps and weather reports to try and line up iconic locations under epic conditions, often in compressed periods of time between a day job or other responsibilities of life. If I understood correctly, this person’s opinion was that “chasing the light” was the principle – and perhaps most widely practiced – way to practice landscape photography.
Their new approach was to spend several weeks at a time living on the road, bringing their day job responsibilities with them and working them into a more relaxed schedule of spending a week or more at a given location. While perhaps sometimes missing the alignment of iconic locations and epic conditions, this approach allowed more time to become familiar with the location, often yielding quieter, more personal images than were achieved under the chasing the light approach.
Both good points for sure, but neither of which really resonates with the way I work.
Here’s a typical way that a photography outing works for me: I’m at my day job (Monday through Friday, 9-5, with limited options for flexibility in scheduling) and I keep an eye out the window on the weather. If it looks like interesting conditions are developing – or often even if they’re not – I’ll head out after the workday to a location within an hour’s drive. Since I live on the Front Range of Colorado, this means I have the flexibility to end up either up in the high mountains or out on the sparsely-populated prairies, so I’m fortunate to have access to a diversity of landscapes. There’s usually no real plan for a subject, I just drive around and look for interesting things that catch my eye. Photograph until there’s no light left – which often is well after the sun has gone down – and call it day.
Or try this: I’m up in the mountains doing something non-photography related. In the winter maybe it’s skiing, in the summer maybe it’s hiking. Throw my camera stuff in the car just in case I see something interesting. When the day’s activity is done, if there’s still an hour or two of light, maybe drive around a bit and see what catches my eye.
Or here’s another example: at the end of the work week, maybe I just feel like getting out of town. So I take off on a last minute road trip to a location within an evening’s drive away. Maybe it’s somewhere I’ve been to before, maybe I try something new. Usually I’m going for the sightseeing and novelty of being away from home for awhile, but I always bring my camera along and plan some time to do some photographic exploring as well.
Or something else: it’s a family vacation, with much time, effort, and planning expended to go somewhere really interesting. Most of my time is accounted for with family or sightseeing events, as it should be. But I always keep my eye on my surroundings, and here and there I steal a few minutes to follow up on something that seemed photographically interesting. Maybe it works out, maybe not.
It’s a very pragmatic, time-available approach to practicing photography because 1) given my real-world schedule, it’s unrealistic for me to be able to chase the light for hundreds of miles at a time, and 2) given my real-world schedule, it’s unrealistic for me to be able to spend weeks at a time away on the road. If you’re serious about photography, then it’s important to make time for it, but if you can’t chase the light or invest weeks away, you work it into your real-life schedule as best you can.
I suppose the thing that got me on about all of this is the between-the-lines implication of this photographer’s blog post (and those of many others as well). The implication seems to be that if you can’t chase the light, your photographs won’t be as good, and that if you’re unwilling to invest an inordinate amount of time, you’re not serious about photography.
Going to great lengths to get photographs is unrelated to the quality of those photographs. It’s a crutch – just like obsessing about expensive camera equipment is a crutch – that people substitute in the place of practicing good photography. Good photography is about possessing a strong, personal vision about the world around you, and having the ability to translate that vision into compelling images. This can be done both within a radius of one mile or 1000 miles from your home, and it can be done both within a time period of one minute or one week. It’s in the mind of the artist, not where you are or how long it took you to get there.